Evaluasi Perbandingan Kinerja Bangunan Momen Frame dengan Eccentrycally Brace Frame

Authors

  • Sumargo Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Rheza Andhy K Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani
  • Hermansa Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26874/jt.vol7no2.283

Keywords:

pushover analysis, eccentrically braced frame, earthquake, steel

Abstract

Generally, earthquake resistant design is based on elastic structural analysis with load factor to simulate ultimate condition. Actually, behavior of collapse structures during earthquake is in-elastic. Evaluation to predict in-elastic condition of structures during earthquake is needed in order to guarantee that it can perform well during earthquake. Analysis and performance evaluation can be done with pushover analysis given in SAP2000, while evaluation of performance point must be determined manually with various methods (except for capacity spectrum method). Pushover analysis is a non linear static analysis as a behavior of structural failure due to earthquake, while performance point is structural maximum displacement during design earthquake.

Study on steel frame 3D concludes that performance evaluation for pushover in longitudinal direction according to ATC-40 gives displacement target for moment frame building of 0.054 m, building with eccentrically braced frame (EBF): 0.022 m. Pushover in transverse direction according to ATC-40 gives displacement target for moment frame building of 0.022 m, building with EBF: 0.015 m. According to FEMA 356, displacement target in longitudinal direction for moment frame building: 0.0803 m, building with (EBF): 0.0728 m. For building with moment frame in transverse direction: 0.1183 m, building with (EBF): 0.0614 m.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sumargo, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Teknik Sipil

Rheza Andhy K, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Teknik Sipil

Hermansa, Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani

Teknik Sipil

References

Applied Technology Council.(1996). “ATC 40-Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildingsâ€, Redwood City, California, U.S.A.

ASCE.(2000). “FEMA 356 - Prestandard And Commentary For The Seismic Rehabilitation Of Buildings†, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

ATC-33 Project.( 1997a). “FEMA 273-NEHRP Guidelines For The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings†, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC,

ATC-33 Project.(1997b) FEMA 274-NEHRP Commentary On The Guidelines For The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings , Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington D.C.

ATC-55 Project.(2004). “FEMA 440-Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

BSSC.(1995) “FEMA 222-NEHRP Recommended Provision for Seismic Regulations for New Building , Washington, D.C.

SEAOC.(1995). "Vision 2000-4 Framework for Performance Based Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 1, January, 1995.

Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, SNI 03-1729-2002, Tata Cara Perencanaan Struktur Baja untuk Bangunan Gedung.

Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, SNI 03-1726-2002, Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung.

Sumargo, Syamsul Basri, Anis Rosyida, “Pengaruh Pengaku Konsentris dan Eksentris pada Struktur Baja dengan Daktilitas Penuh terhadap Gempa, Jurnal Itenas, No. 3, Vol. 7, Sep-Nov. 2003.

Sumargo, Syamsul Basri, Helen Grace Mantiri, “Analisis Struktur Rangka Baja dengan Pengaku Konsentris dan Eksenstris Tipe X (X-Brace) pada Daktilitas Terbatas terhadap Gempaâ€, Jurnal Itenas, No. 1, Vol. 8, Mar-mei.2004.

Additional Files

Published

2020-09-01

How to Cite

Sumargo, Rheza Andhy K, & Hermansa. (2020). Evaluasi Perbandingan Kinerja Bangunan Momen Frame dengan Eccentrycally Brace Frame. Jurnal Teknik: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Aplikasi Teknik, 7(2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.26874/jt.vol7no2.283